Claim Verification Explained
Validating a claim following a vehicle collision involves examining all available evidence—including impact signs, braking marks, scene images, and testimonies—to determine whether the reported details match the incident. The process seeks to align the claim against physical evidence and observable facts.
Reasons for Analysing Crash Evidence
When there is uncertainty surrounding a claim, an investigation can help verify the circumstances. By evaluating impact points, structural damage, environmental context, and digital vehicle data, professionals can determine whether the claim is likely to be accurate. This information supports decisions by insurers, courts, and legal advisers.
Essential Elements in Assessing Claims Thoroughly
Scene Recreation Techniques
Through mapping, simulation, or forensic measurement, investigators rebuild the event to check whether the reported impact location and vehicle interaction correspond with reality. This helps to validate or disprove the claim narrative.
Vehicle System Evaluation
Examining brakes, steering, suspension, and bodywork may show whether the damage is expected with the stated version of the incident. Anomalies here can suggest discrepancies or highlight fabricated accounts.
Expert Interpretation
Specialists in forensic engineering, such as those at GBB, analyse crash data recorders, vehicle positioning, and occupant movements. Their input ensures technical accuracy and contributes to an impartial assessment of claim legitimacy.
Real Example: How GBB Helped Expose Fraud
GBB's analysis of a crash involving an Aston Martin and Peugeot uncovered several anomalies—including absence of tyre marks, misaligned wall damage, and unusual vehicle responses—that did not support the claimants’ description. It was shown the collision could have been avoided, which led to successful prosecutions and convictions.
Why Thorough Analysis Matters
- Separates valid claims from falsehoods
- Supports fairness by relying on tangible evidence
- Protects insurers and the legal process from deception
- Establishes a transparent, reliable claims environment
read more
read more
What Should Involved Parties Expect?
Investigations are led by data and must be clearly documented. Both claimants and insurers should expect structured findings supported by imagery, analysis, and vehicle diagnostics. These findings are crucial for settling claims fairly.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the process check for?
Physical damage, vehicle systems, scene evidence, and technical data are reviewed to determine whether the reported scenario is believable.
When should a collision investigation be used?
It’s most appropriate when evidence appears contradictory or when a staged event is suspected.
What tools do investigators use?
Investigators compare available evidence with known physics, reaction capabilities, and damage expectations to identify inconsistencies.
Why is GBB considered trustworthy?
GBB's engineers provide unbiased assessments based on technical expertise, crash simulation, and scientific methodology.
Do they reduce processing time?
Yes, clear results based on strong evidence often lead to more efficient decisions and fewer delays in resolving claims.
How should individuals respond?
Be open, supply all requested documentation and cooperate with requests for evidence. This approach ensures accurate conclusions can be drawn.
Summary Statement
Where doubt exists, technical analysis and investigation are key to resolving discrepancies. GBB’s collision investigation services provide essential support in separating fact from fiction. Visit their official website to learn more or make an enquiry.